Hi Jeff, spl contains the built-in functions of the official SPARQL spec. These are already implemented by the SPARQL engines and therefore do not require a spin:body. Instead, as you state, the spin:symbol is used to render them into string format for execution. I have put them into the sp namespace to indicate that they are standard functions, and so that arbitrary standard SPARQL queries can be exchanged with the use of the sp namespace only.
Holger On Apr 14, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Schmitz, Jeffrey A wrote: > > Just a couple quick questions about the spin models. First, in the > spl > model, why don't most of the spl:BooleanFunctions (e.g. gt) have a > spin:body? For simple comparisons does the runtime know to look at > the > spin:symbol and build the query from that if no body exists? Also, > I'm > curious about the decision to use the sp namespace to name these > functions even though they are resident in the spl model? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
