James; With RDF literals, you can have either language or type, not both (note the syntax you showed below). Untyped literals and lingual literals are always interpreted as strings, but some matching algorithms will fail without the type, as you noted.
-- Scott On Apr 30, 9:06 am, James A Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > In TBC, when I put a language tag on a string field, in the RDF it appears > as "String"@en. But if I omit the language tag, I get > "String"^^xsd:string. (i.e., the language-labeled string does not have a > xsd:string clause). > > Is this intentional or a bug? Does a reasoner infer the ^^xsd:string when > there is a language tag? > > I have had issues with some reasoners regarding whether a string is typed > or untyped, and I am wondering if this is causing some of the problems I > have been seeing recently. > > Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
