Hi, I have tried this but the result is not the same. The diagram shows that the input and output classes are DIRECTLY related to the mapping. When I use spin:rule, the outputs are NOT directly related, I have to expand multiple relationship.
jl On May 28, 11:16 am, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James, > > in 3.0 please use the spin:rule property to define such mappings. The > class diagram will then display them in the same way as the screenshot > of the blog entry (when you expand the relationships). The entry below > was using the sparql:query property that was used in 2.x versions of > TBC. > > Holger > > On May 28, 2009, at 6:57 AM, jlapalme wrote: > > > > > > > In the following article, a view is presented that show a mapping > > between classes : > > >http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2006/09/ontology-mappi... > > > How do we achieve the same view in TBC 3.0 > > > Cheers, > > > James- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
