Steve; Although it's not a strict "OR" operator, UNION will work in
this case:
SELECT *
WHERE {
{ ?ApplicationUri rdfs:label "forestry"
}
UNION
{ ?ApplicationUri rdfs:label "drilling"
}
UNION
{ ?ApplicationUri rdfs:label "oceans"
}
}
This gets the union of the three graph patterns, binding ?
ApplicationUri to the subject of the resulting graph.
-- Scott
On Jun 8, 5:52 pm, dalguy72 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to be able to be able to specify two (or possibly a list of
> possibilities) as criteria in my sparql query. If I sql, I would use
> the "OR" operator or I would use an "IN" statement. Is there an
> equivalent with sparql.
>
> The simplest example that I come up with is that I want to get the
> URI's for the items with the following labels: "forestry", "drilling",
> and "oceans".
>
> To get one of them, I would do something like:
>
> SELECT * WHERE{
> ?ApplicationUri rdfs:label "forestry"
>
> }
>
> To get all of them in one return set is the goal I am after, and then
> I can place it within a more complex query, such as, in just a
> slightly more complex call, return all the subclassess that use the
> same application uri
>
> SELECT * WHERE{
> ?ApplicationUri rdfs:label "forestry" .
> ?subClass rdfs:subClassOf* ?ApplicationUri
>
> }
>
> Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
