Thanks Holger, thats very helpful. Is there an easy way (sparql query) to determine if a class does not have a named superclass?
-J On Jun 30, 3:51 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi J, > > TopBraid does some background inferencing to infer extra superclass > triples. This makes sure that any class has at least one named > superclass, so that it can be reached from a tree traversal. You would > need to either re-implement this logic yourself, or activate > inferencing on sesame, or simply include the inference graph when you > export the TBC to Sesame. Making matters a bit more complicating, the > triple > > owl:Thing rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource > > has been added by TopBraid into its system triples model, which is > also imported by any project but cannot easily be exported as well. > So, in this case I would recommend to replicate this same triple in > your own file before exporting to Sesame, from the form of owl:Thing. > > Regards, > Holger > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:39 PM, J-MAN wrote: > > > > > We are using TopBraid to build ontologies and data for our > > application. We then move the data & onts to our sesame knowledge > > store. > > > Our RDF works fine inside topbraid composer, but when we move it into > > our sesame store, we are having problems because owl:Thing is not > > being inferred as the base class. > > > How do you infer a class is a direct subclass of owl:Thing? Without > > specifically asserting it? > > > Any suggestions? > > > Thanks > > > -J --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
