<Is there any plan to link the SPIN-check on the cardinality
restrictions to the owl-properties? >
All OWL constructs are defined in RDF triples. Therefore, SPARQL
queries can be created to define the restrictions you need, regardless
whether OWL constructs are used or not.
For example, the following will get you close to what you might want:
SELECT ?prop ?cardVal
WHERE
{ ?cls a owl:Class .
?cls rdfs:subClassOf ?restr .
?restr owl:onProperty ?prop .
?restr owl:cardinality ?cardVal
}
-- Scott
> The idea would be to determine in owl the min, max or exact number of
> properties with a reference from the SPIN-function to the owl-
> property.
> <owl:Restriction>
> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="parties#hasName"/>
> <owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/
> XMLSchema#int"
> >1</owl:cardinality>
> </owl:Restriction>
> Perhaps there is already now a way to refer to that property but we
> don't know how to perform this.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---