Hi Barb,
your suggestion below would not be valid SPARQL syntax and is therefore
beyond what I would want to support. If you need richer control logic,
then using SPARQLMotion to define the body of the function would be a
more expressive mechanism, i.e. pass in the "function name" into a
helper function which then branches into different cases.
I had also planned to add an sml:invoke(?functionURI, ?args...) function
but haven't done this yet. If you are a Java programmer you could add
such a plugin yourself for the time being.
Holger
Barb wrote:
> I have a query which I'm using in a BindBySelect. The select stmt is
> below ...
>
> SELECT ?addConstruct
> WHERE {
> LET (?addConstruct := <http://www.owl-ontologies.com/
> UtilityFunctions#get{?customFunctionName}AddWhere()>) .
> }
>
> I have a variable whose value I need to "plug" into the function name
> so as to call the correct function.
> For example ...
> If the ?customFunctionName contains "XYZ" I need to call spin function
> getXYZAddWhere() and
> if the ?customFunctionName contains "123" I need to call spin function
> get123AddWhere() ... and so on.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Barb
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
