What version of TBC are you using? With 3.2.2 it seems that the namespace prefixes are already sorted correctly.
For the upcoming 3.3 release, I have just modified the N3/Turtle writer so that it will also sort blank nodes (based on their string representations, e.g. OWL Manchester Syntax). Note that the sorting will only be applied when you work on in-memory models. In other words, if you are exporting a database project to an N3/Turtle file, then the sorting will be bypassed because it might be too slow and not fit into memory. Regards, Holger On Jan 4, 2010, at 5:17 AM, pohara60 wrote: > Our requirement is to have a consistent order in the saved file, so > that when we diff versions of the file we only see true differences. > Currently, the order of blank nodes (e.g. owl:Restriction) and the > imports/prefixes seems to be random. > > There were other posts on this topic, see > http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users/browse_thread/thread/b7fcb5edd7db2bd8/a8fea7258532957b?lnk=gst&q=n3+order#a8fea7258532957b. > > On Jan 4, 12:58 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Out of interest: how would you like to see the writer changed to meet your >> requirements? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Composer Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en.
