Hi everyone,
for my thesis I compare different technologies to realize constraint
checking for ontologies.
I am currently interested between the difference between SPARQL and
SWRL/SQWRL.
In the FAQ (http://spinrdf.org/faq.html) it is said that " SPIN is more
expressive than SWRL, because SPARQL has various features such as UNIONs
and FILTER expressions"
In the Protege Mailinglist, the opposite is affirmed.
(https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-owl/2009-September/012148.html)
"SPARQL can be used to query OWL ontologies if they are serialized as
RDF triples but has no understanding of the semantics associated/ /with
those triples/."
/Martin O'Connor gives an example that can be expressed in SQWRL but not
in SPARQL.
Now, I am lost. Is there a good reference for the comparison between
SPARQL/SWRL/SQWRL ?
Have you an example for the statement, that SPARQL is more expressive
than SWRL ?
Thanks a lot.
Rita
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer,
TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en