Dear all,
I've created an ontology with a number of different subclasses:
Superclass: Entity
Subclasses: Actor, Place, Event, TextExtract and others
I defined all of these classes through the standard form editor. When I
look at the RDF/XML view they all appear to be consistently defined. They
all kind of look like this:
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Event">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Entity"/>
</owl:Class>
Which is what I expect.
However, if I open the RDF file itself and look at the saved code, I find
the following:
<owl:Class rdf:ID="TextExtract">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Entity"/>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Event">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Entity"/>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
I'm not terribly clear on why I am getting these two different definitions.
Semantically they seem to be saying different things,
but perhaps I am mistaken and they are equivalent.
Does anyone have any ideas on why this would be happening?
Thanks for any ideas.
Chris Power
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary
Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live,
TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
