Hi All,
   I was wondering if any progress has been made on this and if there are any 
concrete plans to upgrade SPIN to jena 2.7?  In our case, we need to use ARQ 
2.8.8, but are unable to use SPIN constraints because of the removal of the 
Template... classes in ARQ 2.8.8.

Thanks!
Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:topbraid-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] [SPIN-API] Upgrading to Jena 2.7.0-
> incubating but having one issue
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> sorry but you are way ahead of me here. We will look into Jena 2.7
> migration after 3.6 (which is currently our focus to get out of the
> door)
> 
> Regards,
> Holger
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wanting to upgrade my spin-api fork to use jena-2.7.0-incubating
> > that was released recently so that I can start using jena-2.7.0 in
> > other linked projects, but I am having a few issues.
> >
> > SPIN-API currently relies on
> > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.syntax.TemplateGroup and
> > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.syntax.TemplateVisitor that were removed in
> > jena-2.6.5 and hence they are not available in 2.7.0.
> >
> > In order to fix the TemplateVisitor issue I removed
> > AbstractTemplateVisitor. This removal may have caused a sideeffect in
> > SPINConstraints.convertAskToConstruct where I had to remove the
> > reference to TemplateGroup and replace it with something. Naively I
> > replaced it with a call to getConstructTemplate but that appears to
> be
> > null in at least some cases, so two of the tests are now failing. I
> > don't have a comprehensive test suite for SPIN so it is difficult to
> > say what the solution might be. In addition, looking at the test
> using
> > a debugger doesn't appear to show anything interesting.
> >
> > The Git branch that I have been working on is:
> >
> > https://github.com/ansell/spin/tree/feature/jena27upgrade
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid
> > Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid
> Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en

-- 
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary 
Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live,
TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en


Reply via email to