On 4/8/2013 2:53, [email protected] wrote:
Thanks Irene and Holger. I wasn't up-to-date on OWL 2 :)
I've implemented a (Linked Data) template construct combining URI
template with SPIN template in Graphity, and was looking for a way to
correctly model it in OWL. I'm not planning on doing inferencing
myself, but was wondering what consequences such template meta-classes
(like spin:Template) might have on 3rd party ontologies using them.
You can control those consequences by storing your (SPIN) rules in a
separate file. We often arrange namespaces into multiple files:
- example.ttl (the schema)
- example.spin.ttl (the SPIN rules and constraints)
- example.ui.ttl (the SWP definitions if applicable)
This way you can decide to only publish the schema. Add an owl:imports
statement to activate rules while inside of TBC.
Holger
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary
Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live,
TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
