> To the extent that RDF 1.1 specifies different ways of specifying named 
graph, and RDF files comply, we will adopt those standards in due time.

TriG has been issued as a W3C recommendation, as part of the RDF 1.1 suite. 
This allows graph names (note the plural!) to be included in a TTL file. 
What plans to implement this in TopBraid? 

I can see it will be a big job, because currently TopBraid uses the 
ontology URI as the graph name internally (and usually expects it to 
correspond with the file name) so supporting named graphs properly would 
undermine this, or at least require you to call it 'context' rather than 
'graph-name' or something similar ...


On Wednesday, 23 January 2013 04:34:25 UTC, Scott Henninger wrote:
>
>  Peter; I think that explains it pretty well.  TopBraid has always had a 
> named graph architecture, just like triple stores.  But a problem is that 
> text serializations don't have a way to define the graph name, except for 
> the base URI, which turns out to work nicely and transparently.  
>
> To the extent that RDF 1.1 specifies different ways of specifying named 
> graph, and RDF files comply, we will adopt those standards in due time.
>
> -- Scott
>
>  On 1/22/2013 11:20 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
>  
> On 23 January 2013 14:07, Simon Cox <[email protected]> <javascript:> wrote:
>
>  While trying to move RDF data between systems, we have found that TopBraid
> appears to use a non-standard way to specify the base URI in its Turtle
> mode.
> The documentation is clear: on the Help page
>
>     TopBraid Composer > RDF and TopBraid > Named Graphs and Base URIs in
> TopBraid
>
> it says
>
> base URI that identifies a graph is saved within a file using one of the
> following types of statements:
>
>  Hi Simon,
>
> That almost sounds like it identifies a graph, in the same way as
> SPARQL Graph's, which are going to be in RDF-1.1, but are not in
> RDF-1.0. A graph is separate to the normal interpretation of base URI,
> as it encompasses a set of statements, but does not provide a base for
> relative URIs.
>
> To fully support graphs you would need to move to using a quads
> format, with either TriX (RDF/XML+Graphs), TriG (Turtle+Graphs) or
> N-Quads (N-Triples+Graphs) as possible alternatives.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
>  
>  

-- 
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary 
Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, 
SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to