|
Lucas, Mark; I believe Mark has the right idea, but the sub-select
isn't necessary: SELECT ?subject (count(?child) AS ?nchild) WHERE { ?subject kennedys:child ?child . } GROUP BY ?subject HAVING(?nchild <7 && 3 <?nchild ) HAVING is executed after the projection in the SELECT statement. -- Scott On 9/25/2014, 3:44 PM, Mark Graham
wrote:
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
- [topbraid-users] Limit number of results of a S... Lucas de Oliveira Teixeira
- Re: [topbraid-users] Limit number of resul... Mark Graham
- Re: [topbraid-users] Limit number of r... Scott Henninger
- Re: [topbraid-users] Limit number ... Lucas de Oliveira Teixeira
