Hi Claudia,
it is possible that fewer rules fire because the triples of the SPIN RDF
syntax probably lead to some more inferences, and then further
iterations of the rule engine. Some of them may have been unwanted
inferences from the start. Do you have specific (wanted) inferences that
are now missing? If yes, can you provide details such as the rules file?
TopBraid should not add prefixes to the individual rules, but may add
prefixes to the surrounding file. It may basically lift up all prefixes
from imported files, so that the SPIN rules can be parsed independently.
HTH
Holger
On 2/13/2015 22:45, Claudia Grieco wrote:
Also I see that topbraid is automatically adding prefixes to rules
(spra, sparqlmotion ecc. ) is it normal?
Il giorno venerdì 13 febbraio 2015 12:38:50 UTC+1, Claudia Grieco ha
scritto:
Thanks everyone for the help.
I tried 1)converting rules in rdf file to sp:text 2)converting the
entire file in ttl
In both cases the problem I wrote about doesn't appear anymore,
but in both cases some rules seem to not fire anymore (the
inference process seems also a bit quicker) because I don't get
all the results I was getting prior the problem
some suggestions?
Il giorno venerdì 23 gennaio 2015 17:31:55 UTC+1, Claudia Grieco
ha scritto:
Hi to all,
I'm currently using TopBraid Composer Free Edition
Version: 4.5.0
I have noticed a strange behaviour: wherever I launch an
inference on a file, and then I interrupt (Cancel) the
inference process for some reason, Top Braid rewrites my rule
file adding variables at random to function called in rules.
For example the following spin:rule:
*INSERT {*
* ?previousPerson tracking:blobMatch ?this .*
**
*}*
*WHERE {*
* ?previousPerson a foaf:Person .*
* ?previousPerson tracking:blobMatch ?b2 .*
*[....]*
* FILTER (((spin:myfunction(?b2, ?this) &&
spin:hasHumanSize(?this)) && (?dist <= 45)) && (?dist =
spin:getMinHumanDistance(?b2, ?this))) .*
* .*
*}*
becomes:
*INSERT {*
* ?previousPerson tracking:blobMatch ?this .*
**
*}*
*WHERE {*
* ?previousPerson a foaf:Person .*
* ?previousPerson tracking:blobMatch ?b2 .*
*[....]**
*
* FILTER (((spin:myfunction(?b2, ?this) &&
spin:hasHumanSize(?this, ?this)) && (?dist <= 45)) && (?dist =
spin:getMinHumanDistance(?b2, ?this, ?b2))) .*
* .*
*}*
*
*
Sometimes it also changes the order of variables in my fuction
declaration...
What could be the problem?
Note: I'm currently storing rules in rdf format instead of
ttl, is it an issue?
Thanks a lot
Claudia
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise
Vocabulary Network (EVN), Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid
Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web
Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid
Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN),
Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight,
SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
