Although I would do this kind of thing with SHACL I have a larger (I think) question. I see a lot of people embedding content logic in owl:equivalentClass expressions when they have no actual class. Why do people do that? Wouldn't it be better to have an area property and then define the BigPump class as having an area greater than the said amount? I could see, if you wanted to have some numeric evaluation and didn't want that numeric evaluation become part of the class taxonomy making a rule or a validator, but I do not understand this phantom class in an equivalence statement and I see it all the time. What is the rationale, and what is the best practice in class design?
Jack -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
