On 26/10/2017 17:45, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

Ahh

So when you say:

“To use SHACL, people typically import the SHACL namespace, but it's technically not needed. Having the class and property definitions around does make it easier for tools”

This also holds for tbc….(it’s actually technically needed to import shacl to make the specific views show up/work, ok?

If so, would it make sense to always import shacl in case of a new shape file and not be dependent on the dash importing it for you?


You have that choice already. Just uncheck the datashapes check box in the New SHACL Shapes File wizard.

SHACL is by definition extensible. DASH is such an extension, using SHACL's own vocabulary. There is IMHO nothing wrong with using such extensions, as long as they obey the standard.

Holger




        

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist

        

T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        

Location <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

<http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.


*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Holger Knublauch
*Sent:* donderdag 26 oktober 2017 09:30
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference

The Shapes, Validation, and Targets views will only show up when you open a file that imports the SHACL namespace (which happens if you import DASH).

We have seen the "Widget is disposed error" as well in all kinds of contexts, and haven't found a reliable source of this effect yet. It could potentially be a general Eclipse bug, because there is nothing TopBraid-specific in the stack trace. If someone has a reliable recipe, please send it along.

Holger

On 26/10/2017 17:15, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

    All clear, thx

    Wrt previous post:

    After restart (and load file without dash import), the shacl tab
    is gone…guess this is not according below right?

        

    Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
    Senior Data Scientist


        

    T +31888663107
    M +31630381220
    E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        

    Location
    
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

    <http://www.tno.nl/>

    This message may contain information that is not intended for you.
    If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by
    mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the
    message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail,
    for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind
    resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission
    of messages.


    *From:*[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Holger
    Knublauch
    *Sent:* donderdag 26 oktober 2017 09:10
    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference

    So just to be clear on this (for anyone reading).

    To use SHACL, people typically import the SHACL namespace, but
    it's technically not needed. Having the class and property
    definitions around does make it easier for tools, for example to
    make suggestions and to have on the fly documentation.

    TopBraid also suggests and automatically owl:imports the DASH
    namespace, which adding standards-compliant triples to the SHACL
    namespace, including executable SPARQL and JavaScript definitions
    of most SHACL Core elements. DASH also defines some other
    generally useful extensions that should work fine on any
    SHACL-compliant system. So there is usually no harm in keeping it
    owl:imported. To read more about the DASH namespace, see

    http://datashapes.org/

    TopBraid also suggests and indirectly owl:imports another
    namespace called TOSH, which includes things that cannot be
    expressed with "standard SHACL" alone, and require some extensions
    such as additional SPARQL functions. All the TOSH features are
    supported by TopBraid products but may also be supported by other
    implementations in the future. Examples of TOSH features are
    properties such tosh:editWidget that are useful to state specific
    UI widgets for form building. Within TopBraid, the DASH namespace
    automatically owl:imports TOSH, while the official (external)
    version of DASH doesn't and thus doesn't carry any ballast.

    Since the TopBraid SHACL validation engine relies on SPARQL for
    most of its work, and the DASH + TOSH namespaces contain all
    machine-readable SPARQL queries to back the SHACL constraint
    components, they are needed at run-time and are automatically
    added if needed.

    HTH
    Holger


    On 26/10/2017 16:55, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

        Ahhh, ok perfect!

        With the earlier issue you asked whether I included the dash
        import. It seemed to solve the issue then which was after all
        solved by other changes I guess.

        Because I did not really use dash vocab I thought it was
        needed anyway for some other internal reason.

        Retried myself and indeed not needed.

        Thx.

                

        Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
        Senior Data Scientist



                

        T +31888663107
        M +31630381220
        E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                

        Location
        
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

        <http://www.tno.nl/>

        This message may contain information that is not intended for
        you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent
        to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and
        delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content
        of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for
        damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
        electronic transmission of messages.


        *From:*[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Holger
        Knublauch
        *Sent:* donderdag 26 oktober 2017 02:38
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference

        On 25/10/2017 17:26, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

            Ok, I must be confused with another tool,

            final one on dash import…could that somehow be implicit in
            case it’s not used  explicitly (as in the example)?


        Could you help me reproduce this? I tried your example file,
        removing the owl:import statement. Running inferences still
        works for me. The API has code to automatically add the
        missing graph, which should trigger.

        Holger





                

            Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
            Senior Data Scientist




                

            T +31888663107
            M +31630381220
            E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                

            Location
            
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

            <http://www.tno.nl/>

            This message may contain information that is not intended
            for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message
            was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform
            the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no
            liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner
            in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting
            from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of
            messages.


            *From:*[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Holger Knublauch
            *Sent:* woensdag 25 oktober 2017 09:13
            *To:* [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference

            On 25/10/2017 17:08, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

                Ok, thx!

                Works as expected now.

                Gr Michel

                Ps

                Small one: I noticed that (rdfs) superclass instance
                inferencing is ‘automatic’. Was that always the case?
                Or is that because it was only not in owl where you
                needed explicit inferencing? (anyway I like it 😊)


            There have been no changes to these "trivial" inferences
            for years, as far as I can remember.

            Holger






                        

                Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
                Senior Data Scientist





                        

                T +31888663107
                M +31630381220
                E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                        

                Location
                
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

                <http://www.tno.nl/>

                This message may contain information that is not
                intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if
                this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
                requested to inform the sender and delete the message.
                TNO accepts no liability for the content of this
                e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for
                damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent
                to the electronic transmission of messages.


                *From:*[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
                *Holger Knublauch
                *Sent:* woensdag 25 oktober 2017 01:38
                *To:* [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference

                Hi Michel,

                see the fixed file attached. Property shapes always
                require sh:path, so you needed an additional blank node:

                ruletry:PropertyShape_1
                  rdf:type sh:PropertyShape ;
                  sh:path [
                      sh:inversePath (
                          ruletry:hasRadiator
                          ruletry:size
                        ) ;
                    ] ;
                  sh:hasValue "large" .

                To enter such things, you can use the SPARQL path
                surface syntax in TBC at sh:path. I just noticed a bug
                in the beta here - there should be a (...) around the
                path expression in this case. I'll see if this can be
                fixed in time for the final release.



                HTH
                Holger






                On 25/10/2017 7:45, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:

                    Hi Holger

                    Hereby slightly updated simple example.

                    (right name spaces/imports/domains/ranges now)

                    Still no inference as expected (a related
                    MyRadiator with size being “big”).

                    I must still be doing something wrong with the
                    inversePath I guess….

                    (shacl warns me of a missing sh:path so I guess I
                    need a path INVOLVING an inversePath iso an
                    inversePath only?)

                    Thx again, Michel

                        

                    Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
                    Senior Data Scientist






                        

                    T +31888663107
                    M +31630381220
                    E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                        

                    Location
                    
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>

                    <http://www.tno.nl/>

                    This message may contain information that is not
                    intended for you. If you are not the addressee or
                    if this message was sent to you by mistake, you
                    are requested to inform the sender and delete the
                    message. TNO accepts no liability for the content
                    of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it
                    and for damage of any kind resulting from the
                    risks inherent to the electronic transmission of
                    messages.


-- You received this message because you are
                    subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite
                    Users" group.
                    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                    emails from it, send an email to
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>.
                    For more options, visit
                    https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed
                to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
                To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                emails from it, send an email to
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>.
                For more options, visit
                https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed
                to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
                To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                emails from it, send an email to
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>.
                For more options, visit
                https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to