I've been working with the new capability to convert OWL/RDFS to SHACL on
some of my ontology files but ran into something that I thought would be
converted. When I run the converter, it states the following:
The conversation has been completed although 1 anonymous superclasses were
> not converted (these will be shown in a References view).
when I investigate the references view, I see its a class level
owl:allValuesFrom restriction on an object property similar to what is
described in the blog post "From OWL to SHACL in an Automated Way". The
post states that:
*owl:allValuesFrom* statements are converted to property shapes with either
> sh:class (for object properties) or sh:datatype constraint components
The difference I see is that my class is defined as
identity:Identity
rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf ctiDomain:DomainBase
rdfs:subClassOf [
rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
owl:allValuesFrom [
rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:oneOf (
identity:IndividualInfo
identity:OrganizationalInfo
) ;
] ;
owl:onProperty cti:extensions ;
] .
I'm wondering if it the anonymous class for the owl:oneOf that is creating
the issue and stops the conversation process from adding the values in the
oneOf to the sh:class property of the identity:Identity-extensions
constraint.
Any suggestions as I'd like to see if I can generate the SHACL without the
need to hand-modify the shapes file
Thanks in advance
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
