The EDG Datatypes collection type was designed to contain instances of
edg:Datatype only, which are higher level domain classes than RDFS
datatypes. If you are not using these edg:Datatypes, why not create an
Ontology collection for your datatypes? Or the reverse question is why
use a EDG Datatypes collection here?
Holger
On 30/05/2019 3:17 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
The project type of the include is a edg:DatatypesProjectType
it is included at creation time of a edg:DataAssetsProjectType, not in
the imported datafile (but it should be able to be included explicitly
IMHO)
and so I mean
OWL (or SHACL) to edg:DatatypesProjectType
On Thursday, 30 May 2019 13:33:03 UTC+10, Holger Knublauch wrote:
On 30/05/2019 1:16 pm, Rob Atkinson wrote:
We are modelling a system where datatypes themselves are modelled
in OWL, but when referenced from a data asset collection these
models cause import to fail:
v 6.2
File Import Failed
Import Failed. The file declares classes, properties or shapes
which is not supported for this asset collection type. You should
import these into an Ontology. Unsupported resources found:
This seems to be an over-aggressive enforcement of policy to
separate ontologies from instances -
a) i the check should be applied to the imported data, not the
include closure
So are the datatypes defined in an owl:import of the RDF file that
you are importing?
b) datatypes ought to be allowed to be expressed using OWL or
SHACL models
Could you clarify what you mean? You can imagine there is quite a
cost in trying to support multiple ways of doing the same thing.
(a canonical SHACL transformation of OWL models into datatype
elements would be a good thing as well! )
Do you mean for example turning owl:withRestrictions into
sh:maxExclusive, such as done by the OWL2SHACL rule set, see
owl2shacl:xsdMaxExclusive2shMaxExclusive?
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a9531bad-5aea-432f-8c72-fc8e63eb5308%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a9531bad-5aea-432f-8c72-fc8e63eb5308%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5620b6d0-0661-47d0-a591-7122205cec3d%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5620b6d0-0661-47d0-a591-7122205cec3d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/288cdb42-6196-a1fb-1756-7552fe2de761%40topquadrant.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
