This is correct. If one looks at the spec defining this property, it says 
"indicates the resource defining the subject resource. As with rdfs:seeAlso, 
this property can be applied to any instance of rdfs:Resource and may have as 
its value any rdfs:Resource."

However, it is also true that by convention this property is used to identify a 
graph that defines a given resource. I also have not seen it used in any other 
way. One could say that the de facto practice gave this property a more 
limited/targeted semantic than stated in the spec.  It then becomes a matter of 
judgement whether to use it in a way that is different from this convention. 

> On Nov 29, 2019, at 8:38 AM, dprice <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Either end of isDefinedBy can be whatever you want. When used in OWL it’s 
> annotation property so reasons, etc. ignore it.
> 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
>> On 29 Nov 2019, at 08:56, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> Could rdfs:isDefinedBy also have a single defined class/property as target 
>> for a subject?
>>  
>> Technically is seems ok (rdfs:resource range) but I see only uses where the 
>> target is a complete ontology...
>>  
>> Thx Michel
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
>> Senior Data Scientist
>> 
>> T +31888663107
>> M +31630381220
>> E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>   
>> Location 
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
>> 
>>  
>> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
>> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you 
>> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
>> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
>> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
>> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
>> electronic transmission of messages.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/bb242b7e9ec34fcb952871ab19badd8d%40tno.nl
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/bb242b7e9ec34fcb952871ab19badd8d%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
> US +1 (336) 283-0808‬
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/D0A3E9F6-5878-4E0F-938D-B13A1BD76D73%40topquadrant.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/D0A3E9F6-5878-4E0F-938D-B13A1BD76D73%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/C779139E-5A86-491D-8666-19AC86B6037A%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to