Please note that the class ID global identifier would be unique for each of the records (in my second example I just pasted in the same ID for all three items).
On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 3:48:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Phelan wrote: > > Thank you very much for your additional advice. > > "Not well-formed tuples" is likely the wrong terminology. To put things > literally, I currently am producing the first example below, and I need to > be producing the second example below. > > First example: > <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/scorg#b363fc0a- > 2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91> > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> > "A1" , "A2" , "A3"; > <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_organization > #org_id> > "Acme" , "Bachman" , "Connor" . > > > Second example: > scorg:b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 > <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_orga > nization#org_id> "A1" ; > rdf:type <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_orga > nization#CLASS-7d2934e2-2c2b-11b2-8097-001dd8b72b91> ; > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "Acme" . > > scorg:b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 > <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_orga > nization#org_id> "A2" ; > rdf:type <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_orga > nization#CLASS-7d2934e2-2c2b-11b2-8097-001dd8b72b91> ; > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "Bachman" . > > scorg:b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 > <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_organization#org_id> > "A3" ; > rdf:type <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_orga > nization#CLASS-7d2934e2-2c2b-11b2-8097-001dd8b72b91> ; > <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "Connor" . > > > > On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 4:10:45 PM UTC-5, Irene Polikoff wrote: >> >> Are you saying that your SPARQL generates label and id triples, but fails >> to generate type triples such as >> >> scorg:b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 >> rdf:type < >> https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_organization#CLASS-7d2934e2-2c2b-11b2-8097-001dd8b72b91> >> >> ; >> >> >> And this is your problem? >> >> I am confused by your terminology of “not well-formed tuples”. I am not >> sure what this means in this context. Do you mean that some triples that >> you are expecting to generate for each subject are missing? >> >> This would happen if a variable you are using to construct triples was >> unbound. >> >> For example: >> >> SPARQL INSERT {?s a ?o1. >> ?s rdtfs:label ?o2.} >> >> If let's say ?o1 was unbound then you would not get the type triple. If >> ?o2 was unbound, you would not get the label triple. If ?s was unbound you >> would not get neither of the triples. >> >> On Jan 17, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Michael Phelan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The RDF I provided at the beginning was entirely produced using the >> TopBraid EDG web interface's taxonomy editor. My goal is to produce a large >> number of tuples in the same taxonomy which have the same form as the A1 >> test org, but with details taken from the data provided by the JSON >> document. At present, the SPARQL I provided produces the org_id tuple data >> in a comma-delineated list, based on runs to my localhost EDG server. I am >> providing an abbreviated version of the RDF that the current SPARQL >> produces, below. >> >> # baseURI: urn:x-evn-master:somecompany_organizations1_3 >> # imports: http://topbraid.org/imported >> # imports: http://topbraid.org/skos.shapes >> >> @prefix metadata: <http://topbraid.org/metadata#> . >> @prefix teamwork: <http://topbraid.org/teamwork#> . >> @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . >> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . >> @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . >> < >> https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/scorg#b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 >> > >> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> >> "A1" , "A2" , "A3"; >> < >> https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_organization#org_id >> > >> "A1" , "A2" , "A3" . >> >> <urn:x-evn-master:somecompany_organizations1_3> >> a owl:Ontology ; >> rdfs:label "somecompany_organizations1_2" ; >> metadata:status metadata:UnderDevelopmentStatus ; >> <http://topbraid.org/swa#defaultNamespace> >> " >> http://example.org/taxonomies/somecompany_organizations1_2#"; ; >> teamwork:newInstancesUserCannotModifyURI >> false ; >> owl:imports <http://topbraid.org/skos.shapes> , < >> http://topbraid.org/imported> . >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 10:14:04 AM UTC-5, Irene Polikoff wrote: >>> >>> There are 3 triples here: id, label and type >>> >>> scorg:b363fc0a-2c2c-11b2-80af-001dd8b72b91 >>> <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_ >>> organization#org_id> "A1" ; >>> rdf:type <https://schema.somecompany.com/ontologies/somecompany_ >>> organization#CLASS-7d2934e2-2c2b-11b2-8097-001dd8b72b91> ; >>> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "test org" . >>> >>> >>> They all look fine syntactically. >>> >>> What do you mean by ‘not well formed’? >>> >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2020, at 9:55 AM, Michael Phelan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I am pasting the Taxonomy a second time, as there was a typo in one of >>> the namespace references. >>> >>> # baseURI: urn:x-evn-master:somecompany_organizations >>> # imports: http://topbraid.org/skos.shapes >>> # imports: http://topbraid.org/teamworkconstraints >>> # imports: urn:x-evn-master:somecompany_organization >>> >>> @prefix metadata: <http://topbraid.org/metadata#> . >>> @prefix scorg: <https://schema.somecompany.com/taxonomies/somecompany_ >>> organizations#> . >>> @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . >>> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . >>> @prefix teamwork: <http://topbraid.org/teamwork#> . >>> @prefix rdfs: <<a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ec159f8c-f8f9-4280-b68a-c69c1515c5d3%40googlegroups.com.
