In our national modelling team the questions were raised how to best map owl:equivalentClass to SHACL.
Some ideas: 1- related to sh:node (details unclear) (from https://spinrdf.org/shacl-and-owl.html) 2- owl:equivalentClass is just syntactic sugar for: -- rdfs:subClassOf in 2 directions (ok but how to describe it from one shape-side?) 3-procedural: shacl-af rule to explicitly code in 2 directions the instantiation An other issue: How to deal with more complex variants like: ex1:Class1 (when property p=p1) equivalent to ex2:ClassY or even: ex1:Class1 (when property p=p1) equivalent to ex2:ClassZ (when property q=q1) we can always fall back to skos:related...but we want to have some more semantics..... thx for advice, Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/f3f543e565de44f7930fa4626182e25b%40tno.nl.
