Ok sounds good. I have updated the documentation and also uploaded new dash RDF files (also to include other recent changes such as Active Data Shapes).

Holger


On 25/06/2020 17:12, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote:
Yes, I agree that single/multi is a good choice. Most easy to understand.

I cannot think of any other options. It is either working with one object or all object of a property. Anything else seems too complicated to me.

Tom

W dniu wtorek, 16 czerwca 2020 00:12:52 UTC+2 użytkownik Holger Knublauch napisał:


    On 15/06/2020 19:48, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote:

    W dniu poniedziałek, 15 czerwca 2020 01:57:10 UTC+2 użytkownik
    Holger Knublauch napisał:

        Yes, I agree this is needed. I had started doing this for
        *viewers*, see dash:ValueTableViewer. But there is no
        symmetric concept for editors. I have used the term
        "aggregate viewers" so we could call them "aggregate editors"
        too. I have no strong opinion - do you prefer "compound"?


    Not strongly, but I think I do prefer the word compound in both
    cases.

    Aggregation is to combine multiple values into one. Like SUM(),
    AVG() in query languages.

    Compound means composed of multiple part which I think better
    describes the true nature

        Also I guess we could introduce a marker property to indicate
        (in the RDF model) that such widgets have a different meaning
        that other, single-valued ones. What about dash:aggregator
        true or dash:compound true as a flag?


    Maybe they deserve a separate type.
    `dash:AggregateEditor`/`dash:CompoundEditor`?

    In that case I guess we should clean up the inheritance hierarchy,
    e.g.

    dash:Widget
        dash:Viewer
            dash:SingleViewer
            dash:MultiViewer
        dash:Editor
            dash:SingleEditor
            dash:MultiEditor

    which also naturally solves the naming issue?

    Would there be any other siblings to Single/Multi, i.e. any other
    dimensions to categorize by?

    Holger



    My understanding is that they are quite different from the
    per-value editors:

    1. only matched against the property (+ maybe all values) but not
    on every value individually
    2. thus, only one compound editor is shown for the entire property
    3. possibly would update the graph differently, by replacing all
    property objects but that is up to the implementation I suppose

        Holger


        On 12/06/2020 20:55, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote:
        I notice a little asymmetry in the editor/viewer widgets.

        I would like to suggest adding a "compound editor". Such an
        editor would apply to the property and all of its values. An
        example of such an editor would be a multi-select combobox.

        Tom
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to [email protected].
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a36d83f7-741a-4db8-8f95-498ba5d635f8o%40googlegroups.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a36d83f7-741a-4db8-8f95-498ba5d635f8o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/1b72b635-aeb2-4798-8263-b8cf5c691358o%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/1b72b635-aeb2-4798-8263-b8cf5c691358o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/0c87b7df-8bfd-4b2f-beea-7e0e6dba5ff8o%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/0c87b7df-8bfd-4b2f-beea-7e0e6dba5ff8o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b10b55d8-86cb-4223-2274-d2244d7fd73f%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to