Having an owl-rl restriction like:
owl:equivalentClass [
rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:intersectionOf (
:SomeOtherClass
[
rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
owl:hasValue :v1 ;
owl:onProperty :p1 ;
]
How would that best translate to SHACL? (under an inference assumption, not
just checking).
Should I use SHACL-AF sparql construct for each direction?
Or can I reuse some AF syntactic sugar construct in one or both directions?
Thx Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist
T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
[cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/>
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/74333520d9ad48e6a4f5e7ebb8c596a0%40tno.nl.
