Thanks for the quick reply, Holger.

Do you mean that you support only the scenario related to geography, or also 
other similar scenarios? In our case, we want to look at the specific rdf:type 
of the concept that has been selected as the value of one property and use it 
to constrain the values of another concept scheme that are in play for the 
second property.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Pre-limiting values available to the user


*** External email: use caution ***

Hello Carl,

no, the user input widget only looks for the declared sh:class. Doing more 
sophisticated on-the-fly checking against something as complex as SPARQL 
queries would likely be too slow, and people would see the error when they try 
to press the Save Changes button because the form will display an error/warning 
in that case. In your specific case, the situation would become even harder to 
check on the fly, because - as you say - the values depend on each other and we 
would need to temporarily infer all currently entered values etc.

We do have support for one specific scenario though, in cases such as "when 
property1 (country) is 'USA' then property2 (state) must be one of 'Alaska', 
'Alabama', ... in case that patterns is what you need. I can provide details if 
that sounds interesting.

Holger


On 2021-08-12 7:10 am, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
wrote:
Suppose I have a data graph with an underlying ontology that defines a 
class/NodeShape and two propertyShapes as follows:

ex:ClassA
  a owl:Class ;
  a sh:NodeShape ;
  sh:property ex:ClassA-property1 ;
  sh:property ex:ClassA-property2 ;
.
ex:ClassA-property1
  a sh:PropertyShape ;
  sh:maxCount 1 ;
  sh:minCount 1 ;
  sh:path ex:property1 ;
  sh:class ex:ConceptType1 ;
.
ex:ClassA-property2
  a sh:PropertyShape ;
  sh:maxCount 1 ;
  sh:minCount 1 ;
  sh:path ex:property2 ;
  sh:class ex:ConceptType2 ;
.

Now suppose I want to impose a further constraint on the instances of ex:ClassA 
in my data graph: The value of ex:ClassA-property2 is constrained in a specific 
way (expressible by a SPARQL constraint) based on the user-selected value for 
ex:ClassA-property1. I have written a SPARQL-based SHACL constraint to enforce 
this.

But is there a way to use that constraint to actually limit the values 
presented to the user for ex:ClassA-property2, so that they cannot choose a 
"wrong" value in the first place? (I understand that this would likely require 
the value of ex:ClassA-property1 to be selected and saved first.)

Sorry if any of this is unclear -- happy to provide more details if needed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/d85ea09f-4659-4a2e-b066-6d81799d94f4n%40googlegroups.com<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Ftopbraid-users%2Fd85ea09f-4659-4a2e-b066-6d81799d94f4n%2540googlegroups.com%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&data=04%7C01%7Ccburnett%40healthwise.org%7Cccc91564e234474a2b0508d95d10fb7c%7Ccee5d4e942e548c28a033406fd5b9242%7C0%7C0%7C637643149802709086%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=z9oMYYgGdzauY%2BWISY%2FLFajAgSwR%2FKCb89l1pIkwTkg%3D&reserved=0>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/topbraid-users/6hyN44MnaV8/unsubscribe<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Ftopic%2Ftopbraid-users%2F6hyN44MnaV8%2Funsubscribe&data=04%7C01%7Ccburnett%40healthwise.org%7Cccc91564e234474a2b0508d95d10fb7c%7Ccee5d4e942e548c28a033406fd5b9242%7C0%7C0%7C637643149802719071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=flr%2F2arGq7odxXcVTjPYDLivO156HPJtLlpObWzIz4E%3D&reserved=0>.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ee3dca12-0c83-5c96-1462-8cf26a486ccc%40topquadrant.com<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Ftopbraid-users%2Fee3dca12-0c83-5c96-1462-8cf26a486ccc%2540topquadrant.com%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&data=04%7C01%7Ccburnett%40healthwise.org%7Cccc91564e234474a2b0508d95d10fb7c%7Ccee5d4e942e548c28a033406fd5b9242%7C0%7C0%7C637643149802729068%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RWSPtTSK%2Bx01W0hWcW8KwUE8GgyhxAfAxFRL5EyY7WU%3D&reserved=0>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/MWHPR19MB1598A8BD87AA53630FB946C2B7F89%40MWHPR19MB1598.namprd19.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to