Actually, OWL2SHACL handles that case (just tested in Composer 6.4). Something 
else must be “wrong”.

> On 19 Oct 2021, at 10:44, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi David
>  
> That is what I suspected (getting lost in shacl-mapping).
>  
> I also tried:
>  
> sainput:bpsWeg
>   rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:domain [
>       rdf:type owl:Class ;
>       owl:unionOf (
>           sainput:OntwerpSpecificatie
>           sainput:MonsterLaag
>           sainput:MonitoringMeting
>         ) ;
>     ] ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsWeg" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .

 I just did this:

# baseURI: http://example.org/unnamed
# prefix: unnamed

@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix unnamed: <http://example.org/unnamed#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<http://example.org/unnamed>
  a owl:Ontology ;
  owl:versionInfo "Created with TopBraid Composer" ;
.
unnamed:DatatypeProperty_1
  a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
  rdfs:domain [
      a owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          unnamed:Thing_1
          unnamed:Thing_2
        ) ;
    ] ;
  rdfs:label "Datatype property 1" ;
  rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
.
unnamed:Thing_1
  a owl:Class ;
  rdfs:label "Thing 1" ;
  rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing ;
.
unnamed:Thing_2
  a owl:Class ;
  rdfs:label "Thing 2" ;
  rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing ;
.

and get this:

# baseURI: http://example.org/unnamed.shapes
# imports: http://datashapes.org/dash
# imports: http://example.org/unnamed

@prefix dash: <http://datashapes.org/dash#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#> .
@prefix unnamed: <http://example.org/unnamed#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

unnamed:Thing_1
  a sh:NodeShape ;
  sh:property unnamed:Thing_1-DatatypeProperty_1 ;
.
unnamed:Thing_1-DatatypeProperty_1
  a sh:PropertyShape ;
  sh:path unnamed:DatatypeProperty_1 ;
  sh:datatype xsd:integer ;
.
unnamed:Thing_2
  a sh:NodeShape ;
  sh:property unnamed:Thing_2-DatatypeProperty_1 ;
.
unnamed:Thing_2-DatatypeProperty_1
  a sh:PropertyShape ;
  sh:path unnamed:DatatypeProperty_1 ;
  sh:datatype xsd:integer ;
.
<http://example.org/unnamed.shapes>
  a owl:Ontology ;
  owl:imports <http://datashapes.org/dash> ;
  owl:imports <http://example.org/unnamed> ;
.


Cheers,
David

>  
> But I guess not treated by shacl-mapping since not
>  
> Guess I will differentiate them in the inputontology (per sheet).
> I can have them one time in the target ontologie.
>  
> Thx Michel
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
> Scientist Specialist
> Structural Reliability
> T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
> M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
> E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>    
> Location <http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of David Price
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:26 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] spreadsheet import by pattern, no-domain target 
> props issue
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On 19 Oct 2021, at 09:58, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
>  
> Properties in the input ontology not having a domain cannot be chosen as 
> target:
>  
> <image004.png>
> (where the dashes are)
>  
> Is this intended?
>  
>  
> Yes.
>  
> See if you can create an instance of the thing in the EDG UI, and if so see 
> what property shapes are visible. That’s what you have to work with. The 
> importer, like all of EDG, is based on the SHACL Shapes, not the initial OWL. 
> So, if a property does not appear in the SHACL as being relevant for the 
> selected Class/Nodeshape then you cannot pattern map into it. I cannot 
> remember what OWL2SHACL does in this case, but as always you can extend it to 
> do whatever you want. I *think* the property shapes may be there, just not 
> connected to a NodeShape.
>  
> 
> 
> (these properties are valid for multiple sheets so they have multiple domains)
>  
> I can understand they are not automatically proposed but why can I not choose 
> them manually from the list?
>  
> Should I indicate union of relevant domains?
>  
> Thx Michel
>  
> Ps
> Missing target props are defined as:
>  
> sainput:bpsWeg
>   a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsWeg" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .
> sainput:bpsStartKilometrering
>   a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsStartKilometrering" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .
> sainput:bpsEindKilometrering
>   a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsEindKilometrering" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .
> sainput:bpsBaan
>   a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsBaan" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .
> sainput:bpsStrook
>   a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>   rdfs:label "bpsStrook" ;
>   rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
> .
>  
>  
> As you say, these specific properties cleary DO have some reasonable but 
> unstated domain in the ontology.  I imagine what would happen if you ran a DL 
> reasoner on this is that it would infer owl:Thing as the domain of the 
> property which is clearly wrong. bpsStartKilometrering is clearly not a 
> property of Person, for example.
>  
> As far as SHACL/EDG is concerned, this is an under specificed (i.e. 
> incomplete) ontology wrt doing any kind of sensible data validation/UI 
> generation/etc. EDG Data Graphs are based on SHACL Shapes Graphs (i.e. not 
> trying to be a generic, OWL-based collection type). 
>  
> Probably better to make an abstract superclass and tie these with a domain to 
> that class. If you make a complex OWL structure, you may have to do an 
> extension to OWL2SHACL to get what you want.
>  
> Cheers,
> David
>  
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
> Scientist Specialist
> Structural Reliability
> T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
> M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
> E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>    
> Location <http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS>
> 
>  
> <image005.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages. 
>  
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/9f044c442f7f4a9591b29cb8b421f974%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/9f044c442f7f4a9591b29cb8b421f974%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
> UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
> US +1 (336) 283-0808
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5B0F1709-C447-4FD9-AA46-BA7E4C373BCE%40topquadrant.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5B0F1709-C447-4FD9-AA46-BA7E4C373BCE%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/67da6c77b2dd463091c6fbedb5e90366%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/67da6c77b2dd463091c6fbedb5e90366%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808‬

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/D213A3EE-1E35-4C9C-B954-B4411E1C4AAE%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to