Hi Michel,
Dereferencing is not an alternative to owl:import. Graph inclusion is a 
precisely defined mechanism, derefencing is not. As Berners-Lee put it in his 
famous (but “imperfect”) Linked Data paper, returning “useful information” when 
a resource URI is used as a URL is an expectation of behaviour, not a rule. And 
what is “useful”? In practice, dereferenceable resource URIs are a (nice!) 
convenience for human users. I am not aware of any large scale implementations 
where machines make use of dereferenceability in this sense. Linked Data 
Platform is an attempt to formalize this into something actionable. As far as I 
know, LDP never became big, although lately it has been given an important role 
in the SOLID-movement. Today, GraphQL is still far more popular than LDP. Best 
regards, -j


https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

Sent from my iPad

On 24 Dec 2021, at 11:29, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
<[email protected]> wrote:


Hi David

I now remember an earlier discussion on this wrt qudt.
In the end I also had to import qudt graphs despite them being made 
dereferenceable by Steve.

When you say: “The ontology may be dereferenced, but not individual classes.”
It feels like a publication issue…

But can we say that TBC needs the import to properly deal with the class-level?

Gr Michel



Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Scientist Specialist
Structural Reliability
T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Location<http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS>


<http://www.tno.nl/>
<image001.gif>
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of David Price
Sent: Thursday 23 December 2021 10:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] superclass online

You must owl:import ontologies (ie named graphs) in TBC.

The ontology may be dereferenced, but not individual classes.

Cheers,
David


On 23 Dec 2021, at 11:57, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I have an ontology with a class “Gebouw” that is subclassof the 
nen2660:PhysicalObject class available online:

https://w3id.org/nen2660/def#PhysicalObject

(ie the latter is dereferenceable, or well … that is the intention).

In TBC however I do not see the superclass:
<image002.png>

<image003.png>

Is that expected behaviour (ie only superclass visible when explicitly 
imported)?

Or do I have to improve the dereferenceability somehow, ie wrt negotiation…?

Thx Michel


Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Scientist Specialist
Structural Reliability
T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Location<http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS>


<http://www.tno.nl/>
<image001.gif>
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/fa21ce68043a4a6e86d6140492b7aa07%40tno.nl<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/fa21ce68043a4a6e86d6140492b7aa07%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/E129CDCA-5569-4293-A6C4-B14CF7637A48%40topquadrant.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/E129CDCA-5569-4293-A6C4-B14CF7637A48%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6a5436e511da40be8b463ba7e3781f90%40tno.nl<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6a5436e511da40be8b463ba7e3781f90%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/32629AB6-21C2-4003-8E59-6EAC0692C54D%40taxonic.com.

Reply via email to