I've been digging back into some SHACL work that I discussed with Holger
<https://groups.google.com/g/topbraid-users/c/b4pARn09t3s/m/986x35OmAgAJ> a
couple months ago. I'm still bumping up against what seems to be a
limitation in the expressivity of sh:values when it comes to re-using
inferred values, but I'm probably just doing it wrong.
Let's assume that ex:inferredValueProp is a property shape that produces
inferred values for my dataset via its own sh:values rules, defined
elsewhere. Expressions like this one are accepted as valid by EDG:
sh:values [
sh:filterShape [
sh:property [
sh:path ex:prop ;
sh:hasValue ex:Value ;
] ;
] ;
sh:nodes [
sh:path (
ex:inferredValueProp ex:prop2
) ;
] ;
]
But this produces no values. Holger has said this is because inferred
values cannot be reused in complex path expressions like this. Instead, he
suggests to use nested path expressions like this:
sh:values [
sh:path ex:prop2 ;
sh:nodes [
sh:path ex:inferredValueProp ;
]
]
But if I do this, where would I put my sh:filterShape?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/3cda939c-d235-4db5-a6ce-bac67f1cdee3n%40googlegroups.com.
