I solved one problem. Stating the owl:ontology and owl:imports dash: solved the fact the validating file 2 against file 1 did conform (it now fails).
But there are more errors when taking into account inferencing. When I validate file 3 it does come up with the errors (after inferencing). How does this work? Op vrijdag 13 mei 2022 om 13:28:35 UTC+2 schreef Rik - CROW: > Hi, > > I work with the Jena-based Java application to validate SHACL TTL files. I > always put the shapesfile and the datafile apart and this always performs > well. > > But in my latest try the following is happening: I have the following > files: > > 1. Ontology file, including shapes > 2. Dataset file (instances) > > When I validate file 1, it conforms. When I validate file 2 against file 1 > is also conforms. But I know for a fact that it shouldn't (there are > violations in file 2). > > Then when I paste the content of file 2 into file 1 (say file 3) and > validate this, it gives me the correct violations... > > Does anybody have any clue what is happing? I have the latest and greatest > release and with a minimal try-out I could not replicate this. > > Thanks in advance, kind regards, > > Rik > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/43e911b0-5264-4d58-a161-9fa09ae6e998n%40googlegroups.com.
