I have provided input via the survey and I support many of the features discussed there. One thing that would be helpful, especially for defining how instances or relationships appear (color, shape, line thickness, image, etc...), is if these definitions can be captured in an ontology, perhaps by adding additional properties, etc... to the dash: namespace. I would like to be able to define them outside of the EDG Diagram panel so they can be used by anyone rendering assets in EDG Diagram.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:57 PM [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > At TQ we are currently looking at updating and improving our EDG diagram > tooling. We appreciate if users in the forum who use, used, or are > interested in using the EDG diagram features can fill out this > questionnaire: https://forms.gle/gLjqVxNm7G418nfH9 > > Furthermore, feel free to use this thread to add comments or other feature > requests you might have. > > > Best Regards, > -- > Jeremy Debattista, PhD > TopQuadrant (https://www.topquadrant.com/) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Suite Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/f34d99da-86fa-4308-9ba1-5b25e565cd15n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/f34d99da-86fa-4308-9ba1-5b25e565cd15n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CAF0Wbn%2BgX%2BxUfk1u_Sm99BU0ER33BsD5wDPWVqL%3DZ7C4ubUoLA%40mail.gmail.com.
