The reason is that many .owl file "out there" (esp saved with Protege) are in fact OWL/XML, not RDF/XML. In order to avoid confusion, we elected to leave .owl to OWL/XML.
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-xml-serialization/ Holger > On 27 Oct 2022, at 6:08 pm, Derek S <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > the molecular biology world has number published ontologies in RDF/XML which > have the file extension .owl > > I know if I change the extension to .rdf then TBC can import and open them. > Could someone remind me of the logic for why TBC can't open these files when > they have a .owl extension? > > Cheers > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Suite Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/113f378e-387b-4d09-8cb8-71bc00c31771n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/113f378e-387b-4d09-8cb8-71bc00c31771n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/1392FBC1-7F18-480C-AAE1-56997434CB38%40topquadrant.com.
