> On 31 Mar 2023, at 4:37 pm, Adam Kimball <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have a standard set of properties that I decorate my classes and properties
> with. It's the usual mix of skos (example, definition, editorialNote) and
> sometimes a handful of properties that are core the OBO Foundry ontologies
> (curation status, etc).
>
> Right now, I've accomplished this by attaching properties shapes to
> owl:Class. This allows me to get the right properties in my ontology view
> and even set some requirements like every class needs to have a skos:example.
>
> However, I wonder if there might be side-effects which emerge from this. If
> so, what is the recommended approach for curating the shapes of a class /
> property?
I cannot think of negative side effects. SHACL is not OWL DL where changing the
metaclasses is frowned upon.
Did you have anything in particular in mind?
Holger
--
The topics of this mailing list include TopBraid EDG and related technologies
such as SHACL.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/C60C3EBE-B9FD-4D4C-8D15-8C2BD8F003CB%40topquadrant.com.
