There is no real order and it wouldn't matter for the validation report, which is the accumulation of all individual shapes/constraints. TopBraid's newer versions execute validation in a concurrent thread pool, making the order even less predictable.
SHACL-AF inference rules rely on the order specified using sh:order, if that's relevant for you. For your use case, may I ask why the order would matter? Holger > On 21 Jun 2023, at 5:29 pm, Hamid Abdirad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > I am wondering how Topbraid EDG orders the set of NodeShapes/Constraints for > validation, and if this is something that we can control (e.g., sequencing > NodeShape1 to be validated before NodeShape2). > > Thank you, > Hamid > > -- > The topics of this mailing list include TopBraid EDG and related technologies > such as SHACL. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Suite Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/167b8a36-9498-49c6-83d3-68ce9554954en%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/167b8a36-9498-49c6-83d3-68ce9554954en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- The topics of this mailing list include TopBraid EDG and related technologies such as SHACL. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/44FA40BC-5225-43B5-954C-9B69C03CBBF7%40topquadrant.com.
