Hi Joel, bug 953 is not exactly the same, so well done. However, bug #1105 has the comment entry : "[#1105] Modification state of the editorconfigurator file"
Anyway, thank you for opening the new bug. Best regards, Laura. [email protected] a écrit : > Laura, > I am confused by the bug report #953 "add a message in a combined > fragment" that is said to be fixed. I created the new entry #1105 anyway. > > Thanks > > Joel > > > [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi Joel, >> >> you are right, the elements owned by the combines fragments are not >> declared inside this element. >> >> If you don't find a declared bug, could you do it please? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Regards, >> laura. >> >> [email protected] a écrit : >> >> >>> Hi, >>> when I draw combined fragments over lifelines, I see that they correctly >>> cover the lifelines, but I see that the interaction fragments on the >>> lifelines and the messages are not included inside the combined >>> fragment. That is, they are graphically included, but not model-wise. >>> Moreover, when I try to draw inside the combined fragment, those >>> elements are not included in the combined fragment. >>> Is there some way to specify interactions nested inside combined >>> fragments? If not, will this functionality be added in the foreseeable >>> future? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Joel >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Topcased-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Topcased-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users
