What about the case where instead of Class1 having a Signal1 reception, Class1 has a interface realization relationship with an interface that has a Signal1 reception? Why doesn't Signal1 show up in the Object selection for Message3 in the sequence diagram?
Thanks. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Topcased user list where issues are discussed <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob, sorry for the delay > > > > Are you talking about adding a signal between two lifelines ? > > > > If yes you have to set the represents value of the target lifeline > > > > In this example we “represents” Class1 > > > > Class1 has to have a reception corresponding to the signal you want to send > > > > > > Don’t forget to set the signal property of the reception using the advanced > property tab > > > > Finally you can create a signal between your lifelines and choose the > signals used as receptions of your class. > > > > > > I hope it what you were looking for. > > > > Regards > > Tristan FAURE > > > > > > *De :* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *De la part de* Topcased user > list where issues are discussed > *Envoyé :* mardi 25 janvier 2011 08:19 > *À :* [email protected] > *Objet :* [Topcased-users] Very frustrated - please help - Sequence > Diagrams > > > > Folks, > > For three days now I have been trying to do a trivial thing in topcased and > can't do it. I simply want to add a Signal to the Signature of a Message in > a Sequence Diagram. > > I think I must have tried every combination and permutation that my simple > model allows me, without success > > I simply want to use a Sequence Diagram as a verification step for other > parts of the model: to check the connections, ports and their types from a > BDD, and to show the signals generated from a state machine from one block > to another. > > Any help - but particularly a simple example model would be very gratefully > received. > > Regards > > Rob Collins > > > > Quoting "Rob Collins" <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Thank you to Tristan for the answer to my previous question. > > > > I am now trying to represent a sequence of messages (signals / calls) > > between these two blocks on a sequence diagram - but having no success. > > > > 'Call' type messages won't draw - I get a blocked symbol trying to > > connect to either life-line. > > > > I can draw 'signal' between the two. However, when I try to add a > > signature to the signal - there are no options listed in the list. > > > > In my full model, I am trying to draw two blocks, which are connected > > via ports on each block. I have defined state-machines for each block. > > I now want to validate those interacting state-machines by showing > > signals flowing between blocks on a Sequence Diagram. > > > > I also tried adding an operation to one of the blocks (as you can see) > > to see if I represent a call to that. But that also was not available. > > > > I believe that when I have done this with other tools, using UML (and > > ROOM), the signals in state machines could be represented flowing > > between blocks on sequence diagrams. With the sequence diagram > > providing model checking for consistency etc. > > > > Any suggestions on how to model this - or particularly an example > > model, would be very welcome. > > > > Best regards > > > > Rob Collins > > > > ,Quoting [email protected]: > > > >> Send Topcased-users mailing list submissions to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >> http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at > >> [email protected] > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of Topcased-users digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: > >> > >> 1. Required / Provided interfaces - and visibility of labels > >> (Topcased user list where issues are discussed) > >> 2. Re: Required / Provided interfaces - and visibility of > labels > >> (Topcased user list where issues are discussed) > >> 3. Troubles with guards in SysML Sequence Diagrams > >> (Topcased user list where issues are discussed) > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Message: 1 > >> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:20:45 +0000 > >> From: Topcased user list where issues are discussed > >> <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [Topcased-users] Required / Provided interfaces - and > >> visibility of labels > >> To: [email protected] > >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; > >> DelSp="Yes" > >> > >> > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> Drawing a Block Definition Diagram (image attached), I would like to > >> show provided and required interfaces on ports. I can't find out how > >> to change between required / provided interfaces - that is, to change > >> between the 'lollypop' and 'fork' symbol for interfaces. Would > >> somebody explain please? > >> > >> Also, I can't work out how to control the visibility of all of the > >> labels. In this case, the type of the interface is show twice - which > >> makes the diagram a little 'noisy'. Is there a way of controlling the > >> visibilty of labels for connectors / ports / interfaces? > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Rob Collins > >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110119/78f38cfa/attachment.html > > > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: connector_ex.jpeg > >> Type: image/jpeg > >> Size: 26394 bytes > >> Desc: not available > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110119/78f38cfa/attachment-0001.jpeg > > > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 2 > >> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:14:20 +0000 > >> From: Topcased user list where issues are discussed > >> <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [Topcased-users] Required / Provided interfaces - and > >> visibility of labels > >> To: "[email protected]" > >> <[email protected]>, > >> "[email protected]" > >> <[email protected]> > >> Message-ID: > >> > >> > <ACF1D8EEEAEF3249B2ACC4F2493C3BE9E4C4CA@AOFRWMBXRSC001.resources.atosorigin.local > > > >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> Hi > >> to have lollypop and fork you have to : > >> > >> 1) Type your port with an interface (lollypop) > >> > >> 2) Type your port with a classifier using (with usage > >> relationship) to an interface > >> [cid:[email protected]] > >> > >> To change the visibility check graphics property tab you can > >> show/hide elements > >> > >> [cid:[email protected]] > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Tristan FAURE > >> > >> De : [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de > >> Topcased user list where issues are discussed > >> Envoy? : mercredi 19 janvier 2011 18:21 > >> ? : [email protected] > >> Objet : [Topcased-users] Required / Provided interfaces - and > >> visibility of labels > >> > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> Drawing a Block Definition Diagram (image attached), I would like > >> to show provided and required interfaces on ports. I can't find > >> out how to change between required / provided interfaces - that > >> is, to change between the 'lollypop' and 'fork' symbol for > >> interfaces. Would somebody explain please? > >> > >> Also, I can't work out how to control the visibility of all of the > >> labels. In this case, the type of the interface is show twice - > >> which makes the diagram a little 'noisy'. Is there a way of > >> controlling the visibilty of labels for connectors / ports / > >> interfaces? > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Rob Collins > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> Ce message et les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et r?serv?s ? > >> l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut ?galement ?tre > >> prot?g? par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par > >> erreur, merci d'en avertir imm?diatement l'exp?diteur et de le > >> d?truire. L'int?grit? du message ne pouvant ?tre assur?e sur > >> Internet, la responsabilit? du groupe Atos Origin ne pourra ?tre > >> recherch?e quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs > >> efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de > >> tout virus, l'exp?diteur ne donne aucune garantie ? cet ?gard et sa > >> responsabilit? ne saurait ?tre recherch?e pour tout dommage > >> r?sultant d'un virus transmis. > >> > >> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and > >> intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If > >> you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender > >> immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on > >> the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered > >> for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to > >> maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not > >> warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be > >> liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110119/53ed6ab1/attachment-0001.htm > > > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: image001.png > >> Type: image/png > >> Size: 13082 bytes > >> Desc: image001.png > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110119/53ed6ab1/attachment-0002.png > > > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: image002.png > >> Type: image/png > >> Size: 20179 bytes > >> Desc: image002.png > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110119/53ed6ab1/attachment-0003.png > > > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 3 > >> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:25:28 +0100 > >> From: Topcased user list where issues are discussed > >> <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [Topcased-users] Troubles with guards in SysML Sequence > >> Diagrams > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Message-ID: > >> > >> > <64878e0773704846ace4ce0774539dd20e6d14c...@emaileads02.eadscasa.casa.corp > > > >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >> > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> I am drawing a sequence diagram in a SysML profile in TOPCASED > >> 4.1.0. I need to create guards inside an InteractionOperand that > >> belongs to a specific CombinedFragment. I read in some threads > >> inside this list that this can be done creating an > >> InteractionConstraint inside the InteractionOperand, and then > >> creating an OpaqueExpresion inside the InteractionConstraint. > >> > >> I can create it but I cannot see it in the graphical view. > >> > >> I follow the next steps: > >> - Mouse on the InteractionOperand and click on right button > >> and select "Create Child/Guard/Interaction Constraint" > >> - Mouse on the InteractionConstraint and click on right > >> button and select "Create Child/Specification/Opaque Expression" > >> - Then I write a name for the opaque expression and in its > >> type property I choose String > >> - Visibility=public > >> > >> But I cannot see anything in the graphical view... > >> > >> Any ideas? I'm completely lost. > >> > >> Thanks in advance and best regards, > >> Carlos Andres > >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> < > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/pipermail/topcased-users/attachments/20110120/ad370abc/attachment-0001.htm > > > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Topcased-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users > >> > >> End of Topcased-users Digest, Vol 64, Issue 9 > >> ********************************************* > >> > >> <br />-- > >> <br />This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> <br />dangerous content by > >> <a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/";><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is > >> <br />believed to be clean. > >> > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage > exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret > professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir > immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne > pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité du groupe Atos Origin > ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les > meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de > tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa > responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un > virus transmis. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely > for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in > error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity > cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be > triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to > maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > > _______________________________________________ > Topcased-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users >
_______________________________________________ Topcased-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users
