Hello community,

when we look at the questions in this mailing list and if we also have the 
opportunity to see someone who is starting with SysML and chooses to use 
Topcased, we can clearly see that the learning curve involved is very steep. 
The 
Watch example is already a very good start, and of course, the documentation 
available regarding the editor, the document generator, etc. is very, very 
useful. But I think we need something to guide new Topcased users. When someone 
decides to use Rhapsody, they have Harmony. When someone decides to use 
MagicDraw, they have the SE2 Cookbook. When someone decides to use Topcased, 
they don't have a complete example, they don't have a process 
description/cookbook, they don't even know what aspects of the SysML 
specification are supported. Not knowing what is supported and what not makes 
it 
impossible to assess for what sort of projects Topcased is adequate. Not having 
a complete example makes it difficult to find out how to proceed with Topcased. 
And then the user has to reverto to the general SysML documentation. But trying 
to follow the SUV example from the SysML specification or the telescope example 
from the INCOSE MBSE Challenge can be very frustrating for newbies in Topcased.

If we really want a greater user base, we need to change this.

Therefore my question to the main developers who have the project overview: is 
there already any subproject dealing with this issue? (like Topcased Process 
Engineering, maybe?). If yes, how can we get involved?

If there is no such subproject, I would like to propose to start one! The 
project could start by replicating the SUV example from the SysML Specification 
as closely as possible, describing what is possible and what not, and what are 
the work arounds. I would really like to participate in such a project, but 
would certainly require the assistance of someone with much more solid 
knowledge 
of the capabilities of the tool. If we want to start real soon, we could work 
on 
nightly builds or something that already incorporate the new editor from the 
Papyrus project, since this will clearly affect the workflow.

So, community, what do you think?

Rodrigo
_______________________________________________
Topcased-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users

Reply via email to