#23633: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
 Reporter:  arma          |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect        |         Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium        |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.3.3.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal        |     Resolution:  not a bug
 Keywords:                |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                |         Points:
 Reviewer:                |        Sponsor:

Comment (by dgoulet):

 Replying to [comment:8 teor]:
 > An empty pr line is a valid pr line. The relay claims to support

 That is my point, why put that in the consensus then if you support
 "nothing" but claim a Tor version that is recommended? We stopped putting
 "non Running" relays in the consensus, an empty "pr" line is as good as
 that if you ask me.

 In other words, dirauth shouldn't put relays in the consensus that we
 can't simply use.

Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23633#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
tor-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to