#23586: fingerprint in documentation is wrong
 Reporter:  kkuehl@…          |          Owner:  traumschule
     Type:  defect            |         Status:  assigned
 Priority:  Medium            |      Milestone:  website redesign
Component:  Webpages/Website  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal            |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  gpg fingerprint   |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                    |         Points:
 Reviewer:  hiro              |        Sponsor:
Changes (by traumschule):

 * owner:  hiro => traumschule
 * reviewer:   => hiro


 With gpg 2.2.9 on debian it looks like this:

 $ gpg --fingerprint 0x4E2C6E8793298290
 pub   rsa4096/0x4E2C6E8793298290 2014-12-15 [C] [expires: 2020-08-24]
       Key fingerprint = EF6E 286D DA85 EA2A 4BA7  DE68 4E2C 6E87 9329 8290
 uid                   [ unknown] Tor Browser Developers (signing key)
 sub   rsa4096/0xD1483FA6C3C07136 2016-08-24 [S] [expires: 2018-08-24]
       Key fingerprint = A430 0A6B C93C 0877 A445  1486 D148 3FA6 C3C0 7136
 sub   rsa4096/0xEB774491D9FF06E2 2018-05-26 [S] [expires: 2020-09-12]
       Key fingerprint = 1107 75B5 D101 FB36 BC6C  911B EB77 4491 D9FF 06E2

 I have no way to test it on windows but propose to update the website to
 resemble the output of a modern gpg assuming it looks similar with
 gpg4win. What do you think?

Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23586#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
tor-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to