#8240: Raise our guard rotation period
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor:
0.2.4.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: tor-client needs-proposal 023-backport | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:11 mikeperry]:
> I'm not talking about the "Bandwidth=" weights. I'm talking about the
flag weights. In fact, it appears to me that I am suggesting exactly the
same thing you are, just using a different mechanism (one that existing
clients already obey today).
Great. What do we change in these weights then? I still don't see with
these system-wide weights how we can tell clients to still back off from
using a Guard-for-a-long-time relay for other path positions, but not back
off so much from using a Guard-for-just-a-short-time relay for other path
positions.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8240#comment:13>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs
