commit 5380aaca8c1c789fa4f692e93dfdc4e59d4992af
Author: Arlo Breault <[email protected]>
Date: Tue May 14 16:48:01 2019 -0400
Use OnIceGatheringStateChange instead of OnIceComplete in client
Amounts to the same thing as currently implemented in go-webrtc
---
client/lib/webrtc.go | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/lib/webrtc.go b/client/lib/webrtc.go
index 71c96ab..6406da5 100644
--- a/client/lib/webrtc.go
+++ b/client/lib/webrtc.go
@@ -176,14 +176,15 @@ func (c *WebRTCPeer) preparePeerConnection() error {
}
}()
}
- // Allow candidates to accumulate until OnIceComplete.
+ // Allow candidates to accumulate until IceGatheringStateComplete.
pc.OnIceCandidate = func(candidate webrtc.IceCandidate) {
log.Printf(candidate.Candidate)
}
- // TODO: This may soon be deprecated, consider
OnIceGatheringStateChange.
- pc.OnIceComplete = func() {
- log.Printf("WebRTC: OnIceComplete")
- c.offerChannel <- pc.LocalDescription()
+ pc.OnIceGatheringStateChange = func(state webrtc.IceGatheringState) {
+ if state == webrtc.IceGatheringStateComplete {
+ log.Printf("WebRTC: IceGatheringStateComplete")
+ c.offerChannel <- pc.LocalDescription()
+ }
}
// This callback is not expected, as the Client initiates the creation
// of the data channel, not the remote peer.
_______________________________________________
tor-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-commits
