commit b69544ba095710c4b8a6b38c4a965b668b1b8717
Author: Damian Johnson <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Mar 14 13:46:09 2017 -0700

    Simplify assertion that descriptor ends with router-sig-ed25519
    
    The spec says 'next-to-last' but we allow it to be at the end too. Not quite
    sure why, maybe related to sanitized bridge descriptors? Anywho, might as 
well
    combine these two conditionals into one and fix the message.
---
 stem/descriptor/server_descriptor.py | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/stem/descriptor/server_descriptor.py 
b/stem/descriptor/server_descriptor.py
index 76173a0..9c44256 100644
--- a/stem/descriptor/server_descriptor.py
+++ b/stem/descriptor/server_descriptor.py
@@ -669,10 +669,8 @@ class ServerDescriptor(Descriptor):
     if 'identity-ed25519' in entries.keys():
       if 'router-sig-ed25519' not in entries.keys():
         raise ValueError('Descriptor must have router-sig-ed25519 entry to 
accompany identity-ed25519')
-
-      if 'router-sig-ed25519' != list(entries.keys())[-2]:
-        if 'router-sig-ed25519' != list(entries.keys())[-1]:
-          raise ValueError("Descriptor must end with a 'router-sig-ed25519' 
entry")
+      elif 'router-sig-ed25519' not in list(entries.keys())[-2:]:
+        raise ValueError("Descriptor must have 'router-sig-ed25519' as the 
next-to-last entry")
 
     if not self.exit_policy:
       raise ValueError("Descriptor must have at least one 'accept' or 'reject' 
entry")



_______________________________________________
tor-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-commits

Reply via email to