On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Therefore, in the context of whether we can expect SHA-3 and/or > SHA-256 circuits to come built into our chips in the future, the fact > that SHA-256 can be implemented in a smaller circuit means it would be > cheaper for a chip maker to include it.
my strong preference for SHA-2-256 is precisely for this reason. i use multiple systems with hardware accelerated SHA-2-256. these systems will never have accelerated SHA-3. adoption of SHA-3 into hardware designs may change this in the future; i am skeptical :) _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
