On Jan 16, 2012 2:38 PM, "Ian Goldberg" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > > FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography > > > jounral: > > > > > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/ > > > > > > (The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.) > > > > Congratulations, Ian! Any substantial changes since the CACR version? > > No, just minor ones, and I don't think any involving the protocol > itself, but just the text. > > > Have you been getting any feedback from other vectors? Any > > interesting/useful comments from reviewers? > > > > Is it your sense that folks outside of PCs and this list are reviewing > > your work here and giving it the kind of attention we'd want before > > deploying it? And if not, is there anything we can do to help this > > design get more attention? > > As far as I know, only the journal reviewers and this list (and we > authors, of course) have looked at it. Not too surprising, of course, > as Tor is probably the most obvious use case. Most SSL connections involve only one authenticated side. > > - Ian > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
