On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Jacob Appelbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/18/2012 11:26 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> This list of open Tor proposals is based on one I sent out in May of >> last year. Since I'd like to do this more regularly, I have added to >> each description the date when I wrote it. Most of the summaries from >> older proposals are unchanged since last May; the later ones in the >> list for 6/2012 I wrote pretty quickly since I want to get out the >> door tonight for an appointment, but I want to send this list out >> without further delay. > > Perhaps this would make for a nice weekly cronjob? :)
Say rather, a regular task for me to do around the middle of the month. I don't expect movement to be so fast that much changes each week >> OPEN, DRAFT, AND ACCEPTED PROPOSALS: >> >> 117 IPv6 exits >> >> IPv6 is still the future, but now it's the kind of future >> that's unevenly distributed. It's time to do this one so that >> IPv6 traffic can be sent over Tor. >> >> It needs updating to work properly with microdescriptors; it >> also has some open questions about DNS. (6/2012) > > > I'm a little unclear on the issue of DNS with regard to v6. I feel like > we're having lots of DNS blocking issues. What specifically is the > issue? Is Linus hacking on this? Mostly concerning which address to connect to when a user says "BEGIN www.example.com", and which to report to the user, under what circumstances. The proposal, though kind of old and funky, *does* explain this. [....] > psychoed? :-) Whee spellcheck. -- Nick _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
