Norman Danner <[email protected]> writes: > Based on a quick look, it seems like Cyclone provides a slightly > nicer way to specify how to handle the various requests than does a > plain Twisted web application. Are there any other advantages to > using Cyclone as opposed to plain Twisted?
>From what I understand of the two systems, Twisted's "web stuff" isn't really intended as a "web application framework" (yet?) and you'd probably want Nevow or Twisted.web2 for that anyway. Cyclone and Tornado, OTOH, *are* Web frameworks. The advantage of Cyclone being that it's based on the core Twisted async "stuff" rather than Tornado's homebrew (and hence supports more things, has tests, cross-platform support, etcetera). Using Cyclone would also allow you to use txtorcon, as it's based on Twisted too :) -- meejah _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
