On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > BridgeDB was extended to filter bridges that are blocked in a > specified country from its response. BridgeDB needs a list of what is > blocked, and where, for this to work. > > We want to answer the question "What is blocked, and where", with the > constraint that the list of bridges should not become public. > > Here are a few questions to kick off the discussion. Any insight, more > questions (or answers) are appreciated. > > 1. Do we want active or passive reachability testing (or both)? > 2. For active scanning, OONI comes to mind. Do we trust operators with > the list of bridges? A partial list of bridges? > 3. Does an open TCP port mean that a bridge is 'reachable' or should > the test complete a full handshake? > 4. What about pluggable transports (PT)? Will the Bridge Authority do > independent reachability testing of PTs? > 5. What concerns are there regarding detectability of active scanning? > 6. For passive censorship detection, are there other indicators other > than relay/bridge usage-by-country over time? > 7. Should relays report per-country usage by address/transport? What > are the upsides? Downsides? > > Thanks in advance! > --Aaron
Looks like the discussion should be continued here instead: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6414 Thanks --Aaron _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
