On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote: >> Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be >> listed as a tech report: >> http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf > > [...] > > How about we put the LaTeX sources in tech-reports.git, change them to > use the new tech report template, assign a report number, and add a > footnote saying "This report was presented at 2nd Hot Topics in Privacy > Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs 2009), Seattle, WA, USA, August 2009."? > Then people can decide if they rather want to cite our tech report or > the HotPETs one. > > Happy to do or help with the conversion if you tell me where your > sources are.
So, what do you think? Still happy to help. :) Thanks, Karsten _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
