On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:03:06 +0000, tagnaq wrote: ... > Why? > This would reduce the configuration effort required when adding a new > relay to *two* relays regardless of how many relays are in your family.
True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may break into two if it was the only joint. So from an operative point a bit more redundancy would be helpful. ... > A family member must have a *mutual* agreement with at least *one* node. That's (the *mutual*) is an important point that wasn't immediately clear from the preceding. Otherwise I alone can put everything in a single family under this definition. :-) Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
