On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Jacob Appelbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, Jake! > I think this is a fine plan - my preference is generally to track git > tip for urras. I'm happy to track whatever branches need experimenting > or lots of use. I will need to acquire some IPv6 space for the machine > soon for it to be of maximal usefulness in the future.... What I really need to hear on this question is whether there are directory authority operators who are *not* comfortable tracking 0.2.4.x-alpha, but who *would* be comfortable running a hypothetical 0.2.3-da series. If there are are a significant number of such operators, it might be worthwhile to make an 0.2.3-da. But if everybody's happy tracking 0.2.4.x or tracking git, there's no real reason to put out an 0.2.3-da., I think. -- Nick _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
