adrelanos: > Damian Johnson: >>> I fear this thread goes unanswered and someone willing to contribute >>> gets lost because of unresponsiveness. >>> >>> Does torproject have a problem to reach decisions? >> >> Agreed that we should be more responsive to potential volunteers. >> However, be aware that we have over 26 different projects going on >> right now and far fewer than 26 active developers. We can't cover >> everything as well as we'd like - help wanted! > > Someone already offered help: ficus.
I've discussed this with ficus at length. We have some exciting plans lined up. > >> Runa and Jake are maintaining Torouter, but each of them also juggle >> numerous other projects. > > Are they authorized to make decisions regarding the Torrouter project? > Uh, I guess as much as anyone? > (I mean decisions like "We do (not) want the transparent proxy > feature.", "This design is ok.", "This Torrouter image is good, ok let's > call it official stable 1.0.".) Yep. I opened nearly all of the Torouter tickets with these kinds of discussions in mind - until Ficus had popped up, we'd had nearly no active discussions. I think the best way to work out these issues is on trac where we can discuss them issue by issue and keep track of the conversations. > >> Sounds like you're volunteering to become a new maintainer of the >> project, adrelanos? > > ficus's thread "[tor-dev] torrouter development)" may be seen as > application to become maintainer for Torrouter. Not me. We've already discussed working on it together. Chill. All the best, Jacob _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
